★ Best Reviewer Award
Acknowledges the reviewer who has provided exceptionally thorough, constructive, and timely peer reviews during the conference review process. Selection is based on review quality, depth of commentary, and adherence to deadlines. This award highlights the vital, often unseen role of reviewers in maintaining high publication standards.
★ Outstanding Contribution Award
Recognizes an individual who has made significant and dedicated contributions to the success of the conference, beyond typical duties. This may include exceptional organizational work, long-term committee service, or extraordinary support to the conference operations. It is a gesture of appreciation for invaluable behind-the-scenes efforts.
★ Best Paper Award
Presented to the paper demonstrating exceptional technical merit, significant originality, and clear contribution to the field of power science and engineering. All accepted and presented full papers are eligible. The selection committee evaluates rigor, impact, and presentation quality. This is the highest recognition for research excellence at the conference.
∙ The submission must be a full paper that has been presented as an in-person oral presentation at the conference.
∙ Selection will be based on the review scores and comments provided by the peer reviewers assigned to the paper.
★
Best Student Paper Award
Recognizes outstanding research contributions where the first author
is a full-time student. Selection is based on technical quality,
originality, and presentation clarity. This award aims to encourage
and highlight the work of emerging young researchers in power
science and engineering, fostering their continued participation in
academic innovation.
∙ The first author of the paper must be a full-time student at the time of submission.
∙ The submission must be a full paper that has been presented as an in-person oral presentation at the conference.
∙ Selection will be based on the review scores and comments provided by the peer reviewers
★ Best Oral Presentation Award
Honors the presenter who delivers the most engaging, clear, and well-structured oral presentation. Evaluation criteria include delivery effectiveness, visual aid quality, time management, and responsiveness during Q&A. This award celebrates communication skills that effectively convey complex technical ideas to a diverse audience.
∙ All in-person oral
presentations delivered during the conference are eligible.
∙ Selection will be
conducted within each parallel session, based on the review scores
and comments provided by the session chairs/assigned evaluators for
that session.
★ Best Poster Award
Given to the poster that best combines visual clarity, scientific content, and effective researcher interaction. Judging considers layout design, data visualization, the presenter's ability to explain key points concisely, and engagement with attendees. It recognizes excellence in presenting research through the visual format.
∙ All poster
presentations presented during the conference poster session are
eligible.
∙ Selection will be based
on the review scores and comments provided by the poster session
evaluators/judges.